Study Abroad Summer Session MyYSS

Trust–and Mistrust

You are here

Course Number: 
S332
Department (unused): 
HUMS
Description: 
<p>In-person Course. Trust involves a tension. On the one hand, we must build trust on the basis of its absence. On the other hand, trust is best built when a measure of it already exists between those who are trying to strengthen it. What is trust, such that violations of it yield a sense of betrayal rather than mere disappointment? What is the relation between epistemic and practical trust? When, if ever, is it rational to place one's trust in someone, some group or some thing – or to mistrust them? Can philosophers be proponents of the value of trust without ceding our role as critical, skeptical, even mistrustful thinkers? The topic has timely social and political implications. Liberal democracy depends upon citizens trusting that they share a common world and set of institutions enabling them to negotiate differences fairly. The aim of enemies of democracy is to sow doubts in the public so as to undermine trust in democratic institutions. This invites a consideration of phenomena such as polarization, epistemic bubbles, echo chambers, populism, conspiracy theories, "truth decay," and even the idea of "a post-truth culture." In the face of these challenges, how can we hope to rebuild trust in one another and democratic institutions?&#160;Enrollment limited to 20 students.<em>&#160;</em>1 Credit. Session A: May 27 – June 28. Tuition: $5070.</p>
Instructor Name: 
Lawrence Vogel
Subject Code (deprecated): 
HUMS
Subject Number (unused): 
HUMSS332
Meeting Pattern (deprecated): 
MWF 9.00-11.15
Term Code: 
202402
CRN: 
30729
Instructor UPI (unused): 
11693574
Session (deprecated): 
H5A
Distributional Designation (deprecated): 
LMIP
Subject Code (tax): 
Meeting Pattern (tax): 
Distributional Designation (tax): 
Session (tax): 
Course Format (tax): 
Course Categories: 
Prioritize: 

HUMS S332 (CRN: 30729)

In-person Course. Trust involves a tension. On the one hand, we must build trust on the basis of its absence. On the other hand, trust is best built when a measure of it already exists between those who are trying to strengthen it. What is trust, such that violations of it yield a sense of betrayal rather than mere disappointment? What is the relation between epistemic and practical trust? When, if ever, is it rational to place one's trust in someone, some group or some thing – or to mistrust them? Can philosophers be proponents of the value of trust without ceding our role as critical, skeptical, even mistrustful thinkers? The topic has timely social and political implications. Liberal democracy depends upon citizens trusting that they share a common world and set of institutions enabling them to negotiate differences fairly. The aim of enemies of democracy is to sow doubts in the public so as to undermine trust in democratic institutions. This invites a consideration of phenomena such as polarization, epistemic bubbles, echo chambers, populism, conspiracy theories, "truth decay," and even the idea of "a post-truth culture." In the face of these challenges, how can we hope to rebuild trust in one another and democratic institutions? Enrollment limited to 20 students. 1 Credit. Session A: May 27 – June 28. Tuition: $5070.


Apply Now Back to course search